![]() ![]() This paper addresses these questions by applying a gender lens to the power to hurt argument (Schelling 1960) and rationalist conflict bargaining theories (Fearon 1995). The questions of how disputants respond to the deliberate targeting of civilians, particularly to sexual violence, and how this victimization influences the likelihood of conflict resolution, have been left largely unexplored. International Criminal Court, Trial Judgment in the Case of the Prosecutor V.To what extent does sexual violence influence the likelihood of resolution in intrastate conflicts? Despite a growing body of research that explores actors’ motives for engaging in certain types of violence, such as civilian victimization and wartime rape (Cohen 2013, 2016, Hultman 2007, Kalyvas 2006, Wood 2010, Wood and Kathman 2013), the literature presents little insight on the effects these forms of violence have on the conflict and how it ends.ICC, Confirmation of Charges against LRA Leader.Central African Republic, Report of the UN Independent Expert, July 2016.Central African Republic: Sexual Violence by Peacekeeping Forces.Philippines, Armed Group Undertakes to Respect Children.Democratic Republic of Congo, Fighting with the M 23 Group.Georgia/Russia, Human Rights Watch’s Report on the Conflict in South Ossetia.Democratic Republic of the Congo, Conflict in the Kivus.Sudan, Report of the UN Commission of Enquiry on Darfur.Colombia/ICC, Situation in Colombia, Interim Report.Democratic Republic of Congo, Involvement of MONUSCO. ![]() Syria: Detention and Abuse of Female Activists.UN, Report of the Secretary-General on Women and Peace and Security.IHL rules protecting persons against sexual violence can be found in The Law chapters on Civilian population, Combatants and POWs and Criminal repression. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |